What does Facebook’s Transparency Report tell us about the Indian government’s record on free expression & privacy?

Freedom of expression
Privacy
Author

Pranesh Prakash

Published

March 17, 2015

Publication

Centre for Internet and Society

Original URL
Abstract

Given India’s online population, the number of user data requests made by the Indian government aren’t very high, but the number of content restriction requests are not only high on an absolute number, but even on a per-user basis.

Keywords

Freedom of Speech and Expression, Transparency Reports, Privacy

Given India’s online population, the number of user data requests made by the Indian government aren’t very high, but the number of content restriction requests are not only high on an absolute number, but even on a per-user basis.

Further, Facebook’s data shows that India is more successful at getting Facebook to share user data than France or Germany.  Yet, our government complains far more about Facebook’s lack of cooperation with Indian authorities than either of those countries do.  I think it unfair for any government to raise such complaints unless that government independently shows to its citizens that it is making legally legitimate requests.

Since the Prime Minister of India Shri Narendra Modi has stated that ”

transparency and accountability are the two cornerstones of any pro-people government

“, the government ought to publish a transparency report about the requests it makes to Internet companies, and which must, importantly, provide details about how many user data requests actually ended up being used in a criminal case before a court, as well as details of all their content removal requests and the laws under which each request was made.

At the same time,

Facebook’s Global Government Requests Report

implicitly showcases governments as the main causes of censorship and surveillance.  This is far from the truth, and it behoves Facebook to also provide more information about private censorship requests that it accedes to, including its blocking of BitTorrent links, it’s banning of pseudonymity, and the surveillance it carries out for its advertisers.

Reuse

Citation

BibTeX citation:
@misc{prakash2015what,
  author = {Prakash, Pranesh},
  title = {What Does {Facebook’s} {Transparency} {Report} Tell Us about
    the {Indian} Government’s Record on Free Expression \& Privacy?},
  date = {2015-03-17},
  url = {https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/what-does-facebook-transparency-report-tell-us-about-indian-government-record-on-free-expression-and-privacy},
  langid = {en},
  abstract = {Given India’s online population, the number of user data
    requests made by the Indian government aren’t very high, but the
    number of content restriction requests are not only high on an
    absolute number, but even on a per-user basis.}
}
For attribution, please cite this work as:
Prakash, Pranesh. 2015. “What Does Facebook’s Transparency Report Tell Us about the Indian Government’s Record on Free Expression & Privacy?” Centre for Internet and Society, March 17. https://cis-india.org/internet-governance/blog/what-does-facebook-transparency-report-tell-us-about-indian-government-record-on-free-expression-and-privacy.