---
abstract: |
  UIDAI has been providing access to people's identity information,
  without their knowledge or authorisation.
archive-url: "https://web.archive.org/web/20230908215832/https://www.bqprime.com/opinion/aadhaar-hasnt-fixed-identity-fraud-but-made-it-worse"
author:
- Pranesh Prakash
authors:
- Pranesh Prakash
categories:
- Identity
- Privacy
- Security
citation:
  abstract: UIDAI has been providing access to people's identity
    information, without their knowledge or authorisation.
  accessed: 2019-01-15
  archive: "https://web.archive.org/web/20230908215832/https://www.bqprime.com/opinion/aadhaar-hasnt-fixed-identity-fraud-but-made-it-worse"
  author: Pranesh Prakash
  available-date:
    date-parts:
    - - 2018
      - 1
      - 4
    iso-8601: 2018-01-04
    literal: 2018-01-04
    raw: 2018-01-04
  citation-key: prakashAadhaarHasn2018a
  container-title: BloombergQuint
  issued:
    date-parts:
    - - 2018
      - 1
      - 4
    iso-8601: 2018-01-04
    literal: 2018-01-04
    raw: 2018-01-04
  license: Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
    International License (CC-BY-NC-SA)
  title: Aadhaar hasn't fixed identity fraud, but made it worse
  type: article-newspaper
  URL: "https://www.bloombergquint.com/opinion/aadhaar-hasnt-fixed-identity-fraud-but-made-it-worse"
comments:
  hypothesis:
    theme: clean
date: 2018-01-04
engines:
- path: /opt/quarto/share/extension-subtrees/julia-engine/\_extensions/julia-engine/julia-engine.js
keywords:
- Aadhaar
- data protection
- identity fraud
- privacy
license:
  text: CC BY-NC 4.0
  type: creative-commons
  url: "https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/"
listing-page: ../press.html
original-url: "https://www.bloombergquint.com/opinion/aadhaar-hasnt-fixed-identity-fraud-but-made-it-worse"
publication: BloombergQuint
title: Aadhaar hasn't fixed identity fraud, but made it worse
title-block-categories: true
toc-title: Table of contents
---

# Aadhaar hasn't fixed identity fraud, but made it worse

------------------------------------------------------------------------

A [recent
report](http://www.tribuneindia.com/news/nation/rs-500-10-minutes-and-you-have-access-to-billion-aadhaar-details/523361.html){rel="noopener noreferrer"}
in *The Tribune* (*Rs 500, 10 minutes, and you have access to billion
Aadhaar details*) points to vulnerabilities in the Aadhaar ecosystem. By
paying an anonymous tout Rs 500, a journalist was about to access
demographic details of Aadhaar number holders by entering an Aadhaar
number. The Unique Identification Authority Of India has called this
"misreporting" and has stated that no biometric information has been
leaked and there has been "no biometric data breach".

The UIDAI's reponse is a non-response since the *Tribune* article
doesn't claim that any biometric information was breached. Further, if
we take it to be a fact that the UIDAI's systems didn't have to be
breached, then that itself points to a severe problem: that people who
(legitimately) have access to Aadhaar-linked data are selling such
access.

As the Twitter handle \@Databaazi has been pointing out for some time,
there is a little-known feature called the DBT Seeding Data Viewer
(DSDV), which provides full access to all Aadhaar-linked demographic
data to thousands of government officials without seeking the consent of
the people whose data is visible.

Furthermore, the UIDAI's handbook for enrollment agencies allows them to
retain all the data that UID applicants have submitted, including the
biometrics.

We should also keep in mind that the systems mandated by the government
before Aadhaar (identification photocopies for know-your-customer forms,
for instance) also provided ample scope for unauthorised access and use,
and indeed there were and continue to be secondary markets for these
identification details, including phone numbers, which can be used for
identity fraud. Aadhaar, we were promised, would fix that.

> It is now clear that Aadhaar doesn't fix that problem, and in fact
> makes the problem worse by centralising identity data, which were
> disaggregated earlier among various photocopy shops and mobile phone
> stores.

The UIDAI has admitted that it has revoked the licences of 49,000
enrollment agencies, for a variety of reasons, including corrupt
practices, but that leaves it unclear as to what happened to the data
that was collected by those agencies.

What should worry us is that the UID ecosystem (which is distinct from
UIDAI) is leaking like a sieve, even when UIDAI's databases are secure.
If a 'legitimate' party who has access to Aadhaar database (which can be
procured even through entities other than UIDAI, such as each state's
Resident Data Hubs), is illegitimately selling access, then it is almost
impossible to detect, since the unscrupulous use will be almost
indistinguishable from the expected use. Clearly UIDAI is failing in its
duty, provided under Section 28 of the Aadhaar Act, to "ensure
confidentiality of identity information ... of individuals".

> UIDAI has been providing access to people's identity information,
> without the knowledge or authorisation of individuals.

Thus, to prevent this kind of illegitimate access to people's data,
UIDAI has to ensure that no entity --- governmental or otherwise --- has
access to an individual's Aadhaar-linked information without the
individual's express authorisation. Ask yourself: did you consent to
copies of the data that you submit to UIDAI being provided to any third
parties for inclusion in State Data Resident Hubs or for access through
systems like DSDV? Had you even heard these terms before?

Fixing this means that, at a minimum, [State Resident Data
Hubs](https://medium.com/karana/the-360-degree-database-17a0f91e6a33){rel="noopener noreferrer"}
need to be shut down, that all "inorganic" seeding of Aadhaar number
(that is, adding your Aadhaar number to a database without your express
permission) done to date needs to be undone, and that the kinds of
access that DBT Seeding Data Viewer provides needs to be removed.

Lastly, we need clear legal restrictions on when Aadhaar can be used, as
well as guidelines for appropriate Aadhaar use, as most instances of
Aadhaar usage that we have are inappropriate. For instance, on Thursday
[the Karnataka government
announced](http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/tp-karnataka/aadhaar-to-check-illegal-autos/article22363250.ece){rel="noopener noreferrer"}
that all autos in Bengaluru will have to get new e-permits which are
Aadhaar-linked. Why? Because they noticed that auto drivers were driving
without permits and that some were driving using fake permits (that is,
printed permits that resemble real permits, but aren't). Will linkage to
Aadhaar prevent either of these two from happening? No, since neither of
these two are instances of identity fraud. Indeed, it is easy to simply
"print" an Aadhaar card with any details, [as Azam Khan in Madhya
Pradesh
did](http://indianexpress.com/article/trending/man-arrested-for-getting-aadhar-card-made-for-dog/){rel="noopener noreferrer"}
for his dog Tommy Singh.

> Linkage to Aadhaar doesn't magically fix fraud, while increased
> checking of permits by the traffic police along with real-time
> checking of permit number in a database might.

This is just one example. Most instances of Aadhaar linkage are
similarly pointless since they don't help solve anything and can be done
more easily without Aadhaar. Given its in-depth knowledge, the UIDAI
should guide government officials as to what Aadhaar can do and cannot
do, rather than overselling the questionable potential benefits of
Aadhaar.

*Pranesh Prakash is Policy Director at Centre for Internet and Society.*

*The views expressed here are those of the author's and do not
necessarily represent the views of BloombergQuint or its editorial
team.*
